Reference guide
Specific
← BENCHMARKS

September 2026

Introducing Real-SWE

Benchmarking frontier AI models on private, real-world, enterprise codebases.

01
Introduction

Today we are releasing Real-SWE, a benchmark that evaluates frontier AI models on private, real-world, enterprise codebases. Each task comes from a private production codebase that we licensed from a real-world company.

  • Private codebases. Agents must navigate proprietary systems whose code and solutions are not available on the public internet.
  • Work with business consequences. Getting billing right, calculating taxes, and migrating customers can affect how a business runs.
  • Company-specific complexity. Every company has its own rules and ways of writing code.

Can a coding agent actually do the work of a software engineer in the real world?

#ModelHarness
1Fable 5.1Claude Code38.8%
2GPT-6 AstraCodex CLI33.8%
3Gemini 3.8 FlashGemini CLI31.2%
4GLM 5.3Claude Code28.8%
=5Grok 4.6Grok Build23.8%
=5Muse Spark 1.3Muse Code23.8%
7Kimi K3Kimi Code18.8%
8GPT-5.6 SolCodex CLI16.2%

Resolution rate is equivalent to pass@1, averaged over eight independent runs per task. 95% confidence intervals are shown.

Correct billing depends on business rules and external services

Fix invoice billing so each business charges the right tax and exempt customers are not taxed.

View full instruction

Local specimen of the observed disclosure. In a production recipe, give the full task instruction in this expanded region.

TaxJar sandboxInfluxDB ledgerNestJS serviceTypeScript

Agents work across code, infrastructure, and business tools

Tools and services across Real-SWE task environments. Each task exposes only the services its workflow needs.

AWS emulatorDockerKubernetesGitHubLinear MCPPostgreSQLRedisVitest

02
Analysis

6 of 10 tasks have resolution rates below 15%

TaskFable 5.1GPT-6 AstraGemini 3.8 FlashGLM 5.3Grok 4.6Muse Spark 1.3Kimi K3GPT-5.6 SolResolution rate
Multi-region sweep7/88/88/82/83/88/82/85/867.2%
API keys & environments8/85/87/85/84/86/80/87/865.6%
Entitlement overage lines8/87/85/83/81/81/86/81/850.0%
Customer identity migration3/81/83/84/88/83/84/80/840.6%
Billing schedule migration3/81/82/82/80/80/81/80/814.1%
API token metering1/85/80/81/80/80/81/80/812.5%
S3 datastore measurement0/80/80/83/82/81/81/80/810.9%
Linearizable scan0/80/80/82/81/80/80/80/84.7%
Tax jurisdiction1/80/80/81/80/80/80/80/83.1%
Analytics stream reducer0/80/80/80/80/80/80/80/80.0%

Multi-region sweep

Fable 5.17/8
GPT-6 Astra8/8
Gemini 3.8 Flash8/8
GLM 5.32/8
Grok 4.63/8
Muse Spark 1.38/8
Kimi K32/8
GPT-5.6 Sol5/8

Squares show captured success counts, grouped for readability. They do not claim the original trial order.

Selected task: Multi-region sweep.

03
Effort & the frontier

Higher cost does not guarantee a higher resolution rate

Resolution rate compared with estimated rollout cost
Resolution rate by estimated cost. Captured first-party chart.

Estimated rollout costs range from $2.50 to $6.96

RankModelEstimated cost (USD)
1Gemini 3.8 Flash$2.50
2GPT-5.6 Sol$2.65
3Muse Spark 1.3$2.74
4Grok 4.6$3.44
5Kimi K3$3.90
6GPT-6 Astra$4.67
7GLM 5.3$5.12
8Fable 5.1$6.96
Captured time allocation for a short rollout
Short rollout
Captured time allocation for a long rollout
Long rollout

04
Evaluation setup

The public report evaluates ten company-specific tasks. Each model receives a task environment, a written instruction, and the tools available for that workflow. These charts and tables are frozen source evidence, not a live performance feed.

This reconstruction does not distribute private repositories or reproduce the benchmark runner. Metric switching selects between two captured chart views; it does not query a service.